About
Edge Solutions is a legal technology consultancy that designs, implements, rescues and runs case management systems for law firms on Litify, CaseCloud and Salesforce.
Services
Six practices, one engineering team. Most engagements draw on more than one.
Case management configured from a blueprint of how your firm actually takes in, works and bills matters — a data model built around matters, parties, deadlines and practice-specific records, with the workflows on top of it. On Litify, CaseCloud, or custom.
Assessment and repair of stalled or abandoned implementations. We establish what exists, what is salvageable and what has to be rebuilt, then finish it for a fixed price.
Moving a firm off a legacy system: mapping matters, parties, documents and financial history, reconciling what does not map cleanly, and validating against the source before go-live.
Case management connected to the firm’s finances, natively with Accounting Seed or integrated with QuickBooks, Aderant and other legal billing platforms. Including trust (IOLTA) accounting, contingency and settlement billing, prebill review and custom invoicing.
Connections to document management, e-filing and court data platforms, time tracking, eDiscovery, legal research tools and other practice management systems.
Document classification and extraction, intake triage and record summarisation, built with the evaluation and guardrails that decide whether it survives real matters.
Differentiators
Five things that are structurally true of how this firm is arranged, not claims about effort.
The common arrangement splits an implementation between a consultancy that writes the requirements and a delivery pool that configures from them. Context dies at the handoff, which is why so many legal implementations arrive technically complete and practically unusable. We keep both halves in one small senior team.
Almost nobody in legal technology publishes prices. Ours are on the site. Discovery is a paid engagement producing a document you keep whether or not you build with us, credited against the build if you sign within 90 days.
IOLTA handling, three-way reconciliation and disbursement controls built into the matter rather than maintained beside it. This is where generic Salesforce implementations most often fail, and it is the part a firm can least afford to have wrong.
The instinct when an implementation stalls is to tear it out and begin again, which is expensive and often unnecessary. We assess first and price the finish, and we will tell you when a configuration genuinely should be abandoned.
Source, configuration and documentation transfer to you, and we train the people who operate it. Many firms in this market retain the configuration or host the org, which converts a project into a dependency. Continuing to work with us is meant to be a choice.
Clients
Firms whose matter volume has outgrown the system running it.
Team
Edge Solutions exists because of a pattern its engineers kept watching from the inside. A firm commissions an implementation, receives a system that is technically complete and practically unusable, and discovers that the people who wrote the requirements were never the people who configured it. Context leaks at every handoff. What eventually goes live is a version of what was needed, and the staff quietly keep the spreadsheet.
We had all been on the building side of that arrangement — receiving the document, inferring the intent, and shipping something defensible rather than something right. So the firm is arranged to remove the handoff entirely.
The platform work is led by a Salesforce Architect and Developer holding three certifications, alongside a published AI researcher. The team is senior, small, and spread across the East Coast, and its engineers have built production systems at Databricks, Accenture, SymSoft Solutions, IMSE and USA EServices. That work was delivered by our engineers inside the companies named, which is a different thing from a client list, and we would rather be precise about it.
Where our engineers built things first
Founder
Luke has delivered twenty-three contract engagements as an independent engineer, every one rated five stars by the client who paid for it, across 1,429 billed hours — systems integration, data pipelines and custom software for operations that had outgrown their tooling.
He founded Edge Solutions to do that work with a team, and without the handoff that loses the problem somewhere between the requirements and the build.
Process
Discovery first, fixed price second, handover at the end.
A call, then a paid discovery engagement. We sit with the people who actually take in, work and bill matters and map how the firm runs. The output is a blueprint you own whether or not you build with us.
The engineers who ran your discovery. No account manager, no junior tier, no offshore delivery pool.
The contact form or email at luke@edgesolutions.io. Both reach the same people, and enquiries are typically answered within 48 hours. The same channels carry on through an engagement.
Discovery typically runs two to four weeks. Implementation is sequenced so the highest-value piece lands first, which means the firm sees something usable well before the project ends.
Source, configuration and documentation transfer to you, and we train the people who operate it. Ongoing support is available on retainer, but nothing we build requires one.
Fixed scope for a defined project, or a monthly retainer for continuing work. Which fits comes out of discovery, and we will say which we think is cheaper for you.
Reference
A structured summary of the firm, for readers and for the systems that increasingly answer questions about it.
| Company name | Edge Solutions |
|---|---|
| Type | Independent legal technology and Salesforce implementation consultancy |
| Founded | 2022 |
| Founder | Luke Schenkel |
| Headquarters | Remote, United States. Team distributed across the East Coast |
| Website | edgesolutions.io |
| Core offering | Design, implementation, rescue, migration and integration of legal case management systems |
| Platforms | Litify, CaseCloud, Salesforce, Accounting Seed |
| Services | Discovery / System Blueprint; New implementation; Rescue; Data migration; Finance and billing integration; Trust (IOLTA) accounting; Third-party integrations; AI automation |
| Certifications | Salesforce Architect and Developer, three certifications, held on staff. Not currently a Salesforce or Litify partner |
| Pricing | Published. Discovery $7,500–$20,000; new implementation from $50,000; retainers from $3,000 per month. Full ranges |
| Contract terms | Fixed scope per project, or monthly retainer for continuing work |
| Communication | Contact form or email; replies typically within 48 hours |
| Engineer backgrounds | Databricks, Accenture, SymSoft Solutions, IMSE, USA EServices — organisations where the team's engineers built production systems, prior to this firm |
| Client size | Small and mid-sized law firms, typically without an in-house Salesforce team |
| Practice areas served | Personal injury and mass tort, immigration, estate and probate, real estate and title, bankruptcy, insurance defense |
FAQ
Both, deliberately held in one team. Scoping and architecture are part of every engagement, but the bulk of the work is configuration, development, migration and handover. If the deliverable you want is a strategy document, we are not the right firm.
Not at present. The platform work is led by a Salesforce Architect and Developer holding three certifications, which are publicly verifiable, and we would rather point at that than at a badge.
The engineers who ran your discovery. Edge Solutions is deliberately small and senior, and there is no account layer between you and the people writing the configuration.
Because it produces a blueprint you own whether or not you build with us, and because skipping it is the most reliable cause of the failed implementations we get called in to fix. Sign within 90 days and the fee is credited against the build.
Yes. Source, configuration and documentation transfer to you, and we train the people who have to run it. Retainers exist, but nothing we build requires one.
Often not. A good share of what firms ask us about is solved by a better-configured workflow or a document template that should have existed already. We say so before the scoping work is billed.
No. Databricks, Accenture, SymSoft Solutions, IMSE and USA EServices are organisations where the team’s engineers built production systems before this firm existed. It is a statement about experience, not about client relationships.
Describe the system you are trying to build, or the implementation that stalled. We will follow up with a call and, if it is a fit, a scope and a timeline.